Structured protocol
Every change trajectory is the same:
roadmap → workplan → session →
commit → memory note. The protocol is
codified in the repository's .claude/CLAUDE.md.
"AI-First" on this platform is not a marketing claim — it is the operational model. There is no team of human engineers writing code with AI as a sidekick. Humans write the roadmap and review the pull requests; the code itself is written by AI agents following a structured protocol.
A human owns the strategic roadmap. AI agents work each item to a Definition of Done — implementation, tests, security review, accessibility check, and commit. The cadence is not a sprint. It is the steady-state.
Every change trajectory is the same:
roadmap → workplan → session →
commit → memory note. The protocol is
codified in the repository's .claude/CLAUDE.md.
Each session ends with a single commit — scoped, descriptive,
with a Co-Authored-By tag on the AI agent that
shipped the work. The commit message is the change log.
Security checklist + accessibility checklist before "feature complete". The checklists are baked into the repo conventions — not policy, code.
Each shipped item generates a structured memory note that future sessions reference; the "context window" is the repository plus a curated index of prior decisions.
Hover or focus any day for the breakdown. Highlighted days sit above the noise; everything between is the steady-state cadence — ~4.7 commits per business day.
Hover a bar to see the date + commit count. Peaks carry a short note explaining what landed.
The same agentic primitives that build the platform will run inside it. A natural-language assistant for analysts; an AI Healthcare Analyst that drafts payer-policy rule changes from a PDF; an autonomous denial-resolution agent that proposes corrections, runs them dry, and submits for human approval.
Natural-language queries against tenant data, scoped to the user's RBAC. The output is structured rows + a re-runnable query — not a one-off result.
PDF of a payer's revised policy in; YAML draft rule + dry-run feedback loop + human approval out. The agent never publishes; the human ships.
Per-CARC success rates drive a closed-loop agent that proposes corrections, runs them against a sample, and queues the approved ones for re-submission.
These features sit on the same canonical model and rules engine as the rest of the platform. The agents read and write through the same surfaces a human operator uses.
The competitive moat is the substrate, not any single AI feature.