HITRUST-ready as of 2026-05-20
The control families an auditor expects — identity, access, cryptography, audit logging, BCDR — map cleanly. Evidence lives in code + Terraform + the audit log.
Cost, cadence, risk. If a CEO of a behavioural-health billing organisation has ten minutes, these are the three frames that matter. The technical detail is elsewhere on the site.
The legacy stack model is roughly $5K-$20K per month per customer on the platform layer alone, plus DBA support, plus license costs, plus the per-customer integration overhead that grows linearly with the customer count. The new platform's cost structure is different in kind, not in degree.
The cost is bounded by the platform's resource footprint — not by the customer count. Adding a customer means adding a tenant database (a few dollars/month) and a Front Door host (cents/month). It doesn't mean adding a server, a license, a DBA on the rotation, or a vendor SKU.
The numbers above are real production figures. They're not projections, and they're not best-case. The DR posture is dormant-by-default; the passive region adds ~$1.1K/month only when armed — but the wiring is in place so arming is a flag-flip, not an engineering effort.
Model uses the $1.5K base platform spend + per-tenant + per-claim overhead from the platform's infrastructure brief, against the $5K-$20K/month/customer legacy band documented in the competitive differentiation section. Real engagements vary; this is an order-of-magnitude estimate, not a quote.
The relevant cadence metric isn't how many features ship in a quarter. It's how long a customer waits between asking for a change and getting it. On this platform, that interval is hours, not months.
The cadence is enabled by the operating model: AI agents do the implementation under a structured roadmap → workplan → session → commit protocol; humans own strategy and review. The platform is AI-built today; the same primitives will power AI-embedded features (analyst copilot, Healthcare Analyst Agent, autonomous denial resolution) next.
The competitive moat is the substrate, not any single AI feature. Competitors will eventually ship a copilot. They cannot easily ship an operating model.
The cadence is not a sprint. It is the steady-state.
The third frame is the one that lands with the CIO / CFO / general counsel. Security and compliance posture are part of the platform — not a checklist a vendor promises to satisfy.
The control families an auditor expects — identity, access, cryptography, audit logging, BCDR — map cleanly. Evidence lives in code + Terraform + the audit log.
One PostgreSQL database per customer. No row-level security to regress. Leaking a tenant token cannot grant access to platform routes, and vice versa.
Phishing-resistant policy enforceable per tenant. WebAuthn counter-regression detection catches credential-clone attacks. Step-up MFA on sensitive operations.
Partner EMRs register themselves with standards-based JWT. Revoke propagates platform-wide in under 30 seconds.
DR drill artifact dated. Passive region in centralus; flag-flip, not an engineering effort.
Per-tenant DEKs in Azure Key Vault. Quarterly rotation cadence. Connection strings never persisted in the master DB.